Who Are The Domestic Terrorists - In America Today

Considering all of the talk about Domestic Terrorism and the numerous allusions to American Terrorists - by our governmental leaders and the mainstream media - it seems quite relevant to properly nail down the subject of: "To whom are they commonly referring...." Since FEMA has quietly budgeted numerous covert infrastructural projects over the last ten years - while our roads and bridges were openly deprived of equally important and necessary funding - the national threat must be significant! Meanwhile, as Patriotic Americans, we must be ever vigilant in upholding our Freedoms from those who would [honestly] endanger them. Consequently, "We The People " must remain ever vigilant to such threats.

I [for one] will not stand for the scourge of Terrorism being inflicted upon: myself, my family, or my community - in the name of Allah, or anyone else! This is The Land of: Freedom, Brotherhood, and Equality - lest, we forget it... and I, like all of you, have certain expectations of maintaining that Enlightened American Ideal. Therefore, let us consider their most recent political references - in an effort to gain some much-needed insight into this very important question!

April 15th Is Tax Tea Time Again

As April 15th rushes upon us, many Americans are preparing to flood our streets in protest over a government grown considerably beyond any acceptable standards of political constraint! Once again, they will be castigated by our governmental agencies as: Ignorant, Racist, and Anarchist Terrorists... when they merely want our own government to: pay attention, listen to their serious concerns, and show some semblance of interest in addressing their [honest] concerns.... It was for those very reasons that: Freedom Of Speech, A Right To Assembly, and The Petition Of Grievances was thoroughly enthroned in Our Constitutional Laws - as being God-Given and not subject to any State or Federal Jurisdiction at all!

Meanwhile, we again may expect our National Media to either: largely ignore these growing protests, or continue to slant them politically [as something which they are not]! Who can forget the CNN Reporter last year, that expended far more effort in hurling unfounded insults at the crowd, than actually inquiring into the actual motivation of the immensely large crowds? Of course, why ask such questions, when you already know the politically correct answers - you are intending to report upon before you even begin taping? Such a travesty in America, where "Freedom Of The Press" was once so hotly contested, by all!

Is The Gadsden Flag A Symbol Of Hate

Recently, in The State of Connecticut, a state representative was threatened with arrest for attempting to raise  The Gadsden Flag at a Tea Party Event in Hartford on April 9th. Such foolish political occurrences should be [honestly] regarded as, American History - in the making! Thankfully, I have finally located a video confirmation of this event online. Meanwhile, according to the reporter reporting it [previously]: "The Gadsden Flag" was:

• An Anti-Governmental Flag.
• And Represented Hatred and/or Hate Speech.

However, we can [in fact] locate very accurate information on this particular Patriotic and Lawful American Flag... and, in stark contrast to that ill-informed statement, The Gadsden Flag has always been flown as a symbol of proper lawful petition toward the absolute protection of Our Constitutional Freedoms and Rights from Unlawful Tyranny - whether Foreign or Domestic in its overall nature! Moreover, as it was our very first symbol of True Freedom and Equality Under The Law, it has never been used to signify Hatred or Hate Speech, per se`!

Where Are All Of The Statesmen

• Quote: "A Constitutional Statesman is in general a man of common opinions and uncommon abilities." - Walter Bagehot.

There are many words in the English language that are often incorrectly and interchangeably used by: propagandists, journalists, and historians alike. The two most most tragic of these ongoing contextual misrepresentations are that of "Politician" and "Statesman." Although it may sound like splitting hairs, one might as well equate: "the meaning of politics," with "the politics of meaning..." for you would be, in both cases, equally as accurate!

Although it is true, that both of these creatures share numerous traits of common similarity, they are factually very different animals altogether! Both are elected by the consent and/or will of the governed... both hold political position and/or sway as duly elected representatives of The People... yet, that is where all similarities end. However, the differences between these two, are far more significant - than any apparent common referential overlap!

They Are Public Servants: Not Rulers

Contrary to modern opinion, The United States Constitution wasn't written to: establish, promote, or protect Federal Governmental Power and Authority - over The Sovereign States and Our Individually Free People... but rather, to: establish, promote, and protect The Sovereign States and Our Individually Free People - from that Federal Governmental Power and Authority! In fact, no governmental authorities or powers - Of Union, or Of State - were spoken of as being: Un-Alienable, Non-Abridgable, In-Alterable, God-Given, or in any way Absolute... every governing power and authority had its own built in Amendment Making Process. "We The People," alone, were possessive of Absolute Powers and Authorities - in the form of, Our Constitutional Freedoms and Rights!

Nor, are those Freedoms and Rights ever ascribed or applied to any nebulous conglomerations of a societal collective... but are highly-specific to "The Individual American Citizen." Any and all Collective Rights, are only predicated upon The Individual Freedom and Right to politically cooperative endeavors... such as: Assembly, Petition, Political Consent, and/or Bearing Arms!

Why Do I Always Refer To The Tea Party As "A Movement"

In the strictest terms [or sense] of being designated a political party, the “Tea Party Movement” doesn’t currently fit the bill! Political Parties are highly organized, with a standardized organizational structure, and fully possessive of a commonly agreed to political ideal or agenda. The Tea Party Movement   is a disorganized, grouping of equally disillusioned Americans - that has become aware of our impending societal destruction – but has yet to agree on how to properly address the underlying issues involved!

They are significantly lacking in certain relevant historical knowledge, specific political detail, and the fundamental spiritual [or philosophical] social bearing to determine that necessarily common direction… to specifically organize their forces for battle… or to advance a true political leadership of their own at this time! However, that being said, they possess something that neither: the Republicans or Democrats have. That is a desire to effect: True, Lasting, and Highly-Beneficial Change for all Americans [rather than merely for those at the top].

Who Are The Anonymous Legion:

In the course of the Tea Party Awakening , I have observed at least ten distinctive American groups, factions, or dynamics either: developing, or growing stronger [so far]. Many of these, such as: The John Birch Society, The Lyndon LaRouche Organization, The Constitutional Party, and The Libertarian Party have been around for a very long time. While others, such as: The Ron Paulists, The American Freedom Party, Tax Tea Rebellion, The New American Tea Party, and numerous others have not.

Among the latter of these, is a group known as either: Anonymous, Legion, or The Anonymous Legion. This particular one stands out, as being quite different than the rest, in several important key respects. And, I [honestly] believe it is very important that we quite honestly note them….

Social Progressivism Is A Disease.

A healthy political electorate, such as possessed at our nation’s founding, is both able embrace or adapt to necessary paradigm shifts without disenfranchisement, dissention, and internal war! With two divergent and ideologically differing political parties, the electorate can move extensively backward or forward in its political direction – based upon the overall society observing political “Cause and Effect .” Thus, the eventual negative consequences or more beneficial results form a political impetus for necessary change! That is the result within a healthy political system.

However, it is within the nature of “Social Progressivism ” to inherently corrupt the historical genetic code of the society, which inevitably ingests it! This societal carcinogen, although seemingly quite harmless at first, sticks like tar in the respiratory system of our necessary economic engine… and diminishes its natural functions to both produce wealth and maintain its higher rate of economic efficiency. The fact that we cannot feel its effects at first doesn’t in any way lessen its true systemic damage. In fact, it only encourages us to its continued use and complacency!

Political Candor On The Issue Of Abortion

There is little doubt that, for many Americans [myself included], Abortion is a negative consequence of our ongoing human society, murder of the unborn, and a crime – which is perpetrated daily, on a truly massive scale. It is, however, not the biggest problem currently confronting our society, the ones still living, or even our long-term future on this planet! In the hopes of gathering support for the more far reaching and pivotal issues  - which we must [obviously] confront and face – I would honestly direct your attentions elsewhere in the political interim!

Nothing we can ever say will: bring even one taken-life back, ameliorate the grief on both sides of this issue, or solve our current societal crisis on that matter. As much as, we might hope otherwise, we are deadlocked over this matter! Thus, in the spirit of our ancestors who deadlocked over issues of Free Trade, Institutionalized Slavery, and Societal Discrimination [for a time]; we must first address the reparable issues of our day.

The Evolution Of Tyranny In America

In the very strictest sense, all of us [humans] understand the common definition of Tyranny. We learn this concept, at a very young age, through interacting with our peers: at school, in our neighborhoods, and every other common location - in which we extensively congregate. Only later... comes that descriptive word, in the studies of our common English vocabulary. Then, it finally dawns upon us - that "Tyrant" is just the adult word for a "Bully!" It often makes one wonder, "Why do adults have to make things so darn complicated?"


Everyone knows what a "Bully" is.... He is merely someone who refuses to accept "No" as the answer for anything... and he'll do whatever it takes to get it! He'll throw tantrums, jump up and down, shout at you, hit you, and even "beat the tar out of you" to get what he wants. We've all had dealings with them! They are loud, obnoxious, and rude. They are abusive, manipulative, and divisive. And, they are a clearly psychopathic menace to our overall society... no matter how large the scope of that society may be! So why, in the world, do we always seem to tolerate them? The answers to this question are numerous....

The Lesser Of Two Evils

Framing an argument, as "The Lesser Of Two Evils" is the greatest trick, which has ever been perpetrated upon mankind! Its highly valued rhetorical construction should be held in equal esteem with the invention of the two-headed coin, as an objective means of settling disputes among friends. While it offers the appearance of an unbiased choice [on the part of all active participants] it offers no relevant choices at all… since the direction is already largely predetermined and the only relevant point of contention is the relative pace of its eventual adoption as the de facto societal structure.

In the case of choosing amongst [Social-Fascist] Democrats and [Fascist] Republicans, we may effectively choose between a Social-Fascist State with the attachment of further Progressive-Socialism, or without it... but, in either case, neither: the current level of American Fascism, nor the debilitating and progressively socialistic bureaucracy already established are called into serious question. That is because the two major political parties are both Fascist [or Leftist] constructions. This brings us back to that proverbial two-headed coin....

Free Market Governance

Quote:
"Those who fail to learn from the experiences of history are destined to repeat the mistakes of it!"

A little over 200 years ago, our enlightened ancestors - The Founding Fathers - devised a system of governance, which was fundamentally different from any other devised by man; either before, or since. "The Great Experiment," as Lincoln later referred to it, was a beneficial Union of Interdependent and Sovereign American States. It was designed in such a way as to: "Protect the general welfare [i.e.. protect individual freedoms]," "Ensure the domestic tranquility [i.e.. ensure political and societal stability]," and promote the concept of Free Market Government!

Free Market Government is not only a uniquely American concept, it is [also] the greatest single concept ever devised by man! Its practical application: ensured the maximization of Personal Freedom to its individual citizens [while providing a much-needed common political and societal framework to operate under] , spurred valuable innovation in the area of governmental services [while inspiring necessary economy and efficiency in government], and elevated respect for the due process of law [while providing a peaceable and beneficial mechanism of escape from oppressive regulations and/or restrictions on the part of individual governments]. All the individual citizen need merely do is to take up his things and simply walk away! In an ever evolving diversity of Individually Sovereign States, there would always be others more to his liking somewhere... and if not, then he [along with the numerous others, so politically inclined] could start his own - more to his own liking.